National Unity -A Worshipped Idol

National Unity – A Worshipped Idol

penned by Shiekh Dr Ayman Al-Zawahiri HA)

Sanctifying national unity is one of the rotten fruits of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, which divided

the Muslim Ummah into various pieces of booty, in order to plunder the wealth left over from

the Ottoman Empire. This criminal imperialistic politics caused an idea to nestle into our minds

until it became an idol, held sacred. According to it, it is obligatory upon Muslims of any one par-

ticular place or country to unify with each other, even if it be with those who may be from the

worst enemies of Islam, and the filthiest of creatures from the traitors, and traders of principles

and values. The Noble Quran has informed us that there was no Prophet except that his people

opposed and fought him. Allah, the Truth () says:

34. And We did not send a warner to a township but those who were given the

worldly wealth and luxuries among them said: “We believe not in the (Message) with

which you have been sent.” (Saba: 34)

23. And similarly, We sent not a warner before you (O Muhammad ) to any town

(people) but the luxurious ones among them said: “We found our fathers following a

certain way and religion, and we will indeed follow their footsteps.” (Az-Zukhruf: 23)

123. And thus We have set up in every town great ones of its wicked people to plot

therein. But they plot not except against their own selves, and they perceive (it) not.

(Al-An’aam: 123)

Our Lord and Protector () has also informed us that He has sent His Messengers to call people

to Tawheed, even if that divided their people into [two ranks:] the guided and the deviant. Allah

(), the Truth, says

25. And We did not send any Messenger before you (O Muhammad ) but We re-

vealed to him (saying): La ilaha illa Ana [none has the right to be worshipped but I (Al-

lah)], so worship Me (Alone and none else).” (Al-Anbiyaa: 25)

please read . .. National Unity – A Worshipped Idol http://www.tawhed.net/

7 Reasons To Nuke The USA

7 Reasons To Nuke The USA By Yamin Zakaria 02/23/07 "ICH" -- -- According to the doctrine of pre-emptive strike which the US has adopted since 9/11, it too can be subjected to a pre-emptive nuclear strike, as it poses a threat to other peaceful nations of the world. The US has a sordid track record for using such weapons against civilians and it has constantly maintained a large stockpile of such weapons of mass destruction, and continuously develops them. There are additional reasons to nuke the US, however I have decided to highlight only seven, which I have listed below. This is partly for brevity and I hope it might have some resonance with the Zionist-Christian Fundamentalists, especially the nutty ones, as number 7 has significance in the Bible. Also, they are constantly yearning for the Armageddon, and nuking USA may only speed up the process, so for a change I might have these Christian-Zionists on my side! The Halleluiah brigade would probably jump up, waving their arms in the air whilst claiming to be speaking in tongues, proclaim that the good Lord says: bring it on, nuke the US for their sins! Perhaps, I would also have the communists and their variants to concur with me, as nuking the leading capitalist nation by non-state actors would seem like initiating a 21st century explosive revolution by the powerless proletariats against the capitalist class! Before anyone screams mass murder, they ought to consider that their judgments will rest on the identity of the victims and the perpetrators. If it is the ‘terrorists’ (non state-actors, freedom fighters, Iraqi resistance etc) nuking the US, it will be depicted as terrorism and mass murder; conversely if the US uses such weapons, it will be defensive measures in the guise of a pre-emptive strike to eliminate potential threats incurring lots of collateral damages. Like the collateral damages inflicted on a massive scale when the Atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, neither were military targets and by this time Japan was already on its knees with no Air Force and its Navy almost annihilated. Perhaps one day some objective historian might call that an act of terrorism! Let me now list the 7 reasons to Nuke the USA. 1) The US was established on the blood of 70 million Native Americans. Their lands were stolen. Since the US leadership considers it right of the Jews to occupy Palestine as they lived here over 2000 years ago, then the Native Americans can also argue back only 500 years and have their lands returned to them. So a valid ground to repatriate the European colonizers, if they refuse they can be herded into camps, subjected to a trail of tears. Alternatively they can be nuked out of existence for resisting, as well as retribution for the brutal killing of their ancestors. 2) Consider the crimes against the Africans, their enslavement, oppression and lynching for centuries, which led to millions perishing. An irony of the declaration of independence by the Founding Fathers of the US, who stated that all men were created equal, whilst Afro-Americans were subjected to such brutality which continued for many decades. They have the right seek retribution (including nuclear strike) against the descendents of the criminals who have not paid them any compensation. 3) During the Spanish-American war at the turn of century, Philippines was colonized, and at least a 250,000 Filipinos were killed, then the country was turned into a brothel for the US soldiers, and it continues to be used in that manner. We don’t find Billy Graham and his ilk lecturing about the sin here. Nor do we find the voices for women’s rights; I suppose if they covered up instead of spreading their legs to the US soldiers then it would be cause for alarm! The Filipinos have the right of retribution for the carnage and rape. 4) The killing of the innocent Vietnamese populations and supporting monsters like the Pol Pot led to millions of Cambodians being killed. They too have the right of retribution and a nuclear strike would serve as deterrence for future attacks by the US. 5) The ongoing ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians through arming the Zionists, and the genocide against the Iraqis from 1991 onwards are good reasons to nuke the US and halt the massacre and oppression. A bully always think twice when it gets a punched by one of its victim. The only reason why the US has not used nukes against the Islamic world because it fears nuclear reprisal, as Muslims do not believe in turning the other cheek, for that matter neither do the Christians! 6) Using the various financial institutions, and bribing corrupt regimes, the US has exploited the economic resources for its own benefit, bringing misery to millions around the world. Nuking the US would halt these forms of oppression, and a new economic order is likely to prevail after it is crippled permanently by nuking it. 7) At present everyone is speculating the use of nuclear weapons against Iran by the US or through its proxy Israel. A pre-emptive strike would make the US and the Zionists think twice, as the American and Israeli masses might appreciate what it means to use such weapons. I doubt they would have the appetite for more. For the Iraqis and the oppressed around the world they are already dying, their situation is unlikely to get any worse than it is. Using the principles of free speech I have expressed the case for nuking the US and I am sure others would add to the above list. My opponents would try and gag me under the pretext of promoting terrorism, of course that is because I am advocating that Americans are terrorized in order to restrain the beast amongst them. Giving them a taste of their own medicine would make the US masses actually realize what foreign policy, collateral damages etc really means! In contrast, the numerous times calls have been made to nuke Iran, Mecca, North Korea etc goes unnoticed, of course that would not be promoting terrorism but upholding free speech. Is this not double standard? Of course not as it depends on whose standards you are using as a yardstick! Although I have made the case for nuking the US but I would oppose the use of such weapons, a nuclear war would lead to everyone losing out. Mass murder on such a scale would bring misery to all sides. Hence, I would favor a genuine nuclear-free world and not a nuclear-free Iran only! Likewise a nuclear-free Middle East and not a nuclear Israel with nuclear-free Arabs. The only justification for using such weapons would be one of last resort of self-defense, which the Iranians, Iraqis and Palestinians and others might resort to given the constant US and Israeli aggression against them. Now consider this scenario, a Caliphate is established in the Middle East that has unified the Islamic world, it’s armed with nuclear weapons. No doubt it would be competing with the US in the international arena. Who is more like to use such weapons? Foreign policy of the Caliphate is Jihad, which is the spread of Islam, using nukes to annihilate entire section of population, would defeat that central objective of spreading the message of Islam. Nukes and Jihad does not go hand in hand unless it is entirely for defensive purpose. Where as the US as a Capitalist nation is a far better candidate as it: has a track record for using such weapons; it seeks to maximize its interests at any cost, so annihilating other races fits with its philosophy and morals, and it has a strong record for committing genocide on a massive scale in order to exploit natural resources and enforce hegemony. They scream peace, but what they mean is war; they shout freedom but what they mean is enslavement; they shout democracy but what they mean is democracy for its multinationals. The Holy Quran describes such people whose words contradict their deeds: “And when it is said unto them: Make not mischief in the earth, they say: We are peacemakers only. Are not they indeed the mischief-makers? But they perceive not. (2:11-12)” Yamin Zakaria (www.iiop.org) - Mumbai, India

New York Times's fairy tale about Gaza

Instead of telling the truth about the situation in the Gaza strip, New York Times' Ethan Bronner has brewed a fairy tale that only exists in his comatose world.

In my earlier blog post I had written how Health conditions in Gaza has deteriorated, and had reminded how with the control of medicine and food in the hands of the Israelis, people in the Gaza strip find themselves squeezed without relief.

Eva Bartlett who recently visited Gaza writes about the conditions there:

The water is still contaminated from untreated sewage pumped into the sea for want of treatment facilities. By World Health Organization standards, roughly 95 per cent of Gaza’s water is not safe to drink.

Diesel-fueled generators sputter into action, polluting the air and silence, when the power cuts out, day or night. Unemployment has reached 45 per cent, one of the highest rates in the world. Fishermen are still shot at, shelled and arrested by the Israeli navy inside Palestine’s waters – even as close as three miles from the coast. And farmers continue to be pushed off their land near the border by Israeli shootings and shelling.

International Investigations, like the one conducted by the Norwegian Government shows that:

 "The Gaza Strip still has a persistent drug shortage, despite some recent Israeli and Egyptian talks about easing the strict blockade that has left this crowded enclave isolated since July, 2007. A political rift between the Hamas-run Government of Gaza and Fatah officials in the West Bank hinders communication and coordination between the Palestinian health ministries—adding to the hardships already faced by patients in Gaza."

It also added that Norwegian physicians Tone Hegna and Åse Vikanes followed the delivery of 200 pallets of medical supplies from Ramallah to Gaza in early February 2011. They confirmed that many drugs and basic disposables remain in short supply, and that a bad situation is made worse by inadequate storage, transport and incineration facilities.

But Bronner seems to be oblivious of these facts, and draws attention of his readers to the make believe world of "Hundreds of BMWs, pickup trucks and other vehicles have arrived in recent months from Libya, driven through Egypt and sold via the unmonitored tunnels." He goes on that, "It turns out that unlike three or four years ago, when people speak about shortage, they don’t mean herbs, but rather four-wheel vehicles – one of the few items Israel does not allow into the Strip."

These so-called "untold side of Gaza" comes at a time, when Freedom Flotilla 2, is about to reach Gaza in a few days, Ethan Bronner and the agents of Israel at New York Times want to draw a folly impression that the situation in Gaza is absolutely fine, and there is no necessity of any Humanitarian aid for the besieged population.

Israel with the help of people like Ethan Bronner, wants to tell the world that any attempt to help the Palestinians will lead to provocation and impeachment of Israel's borders, and in such a case, Israel will have justifiable reasons to use any kind of force to safeguard its safety and security.

- Shaik Zakeer Hussain

College Conspiracy

How the US lures its students into life long slavery by the time student graduates they are in debted to over 200,000 loans and have to pay all their life and they don't even have a job yet. The only solution to this is implement shariah which is free of usury you will not be enslaved

U.S. Diplomats in Afghanistan Work Under “the Most Difficult Conditions Imaginable”

Amir ul Momineen (al hittin's addition) Mullah Omar reportedly refers to these U.S. diplomats as “Askaran-e-Atar” or Perfume Soldiers.

On June 23, 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, swore the following about her diplomats in Afghanistan:

“And the efforts of our civilians on the ground, working in some of the most difficult conditions imaginable, continue to be nothing short of extraordinary.”

“Some of the most difficult conditions imaginable” - could she possibly believe this? The reality is that American diplomats deployed to Afghanistan live pampered and protected lives. They are deployed for one-year tours and are paid a minimum of $150,000 a year (salary plus danger and other pay). They are provided with room and board, and most are entitled to up to 60 days vacation and leave, so they only tend to be in-country for 10 months. They all live either in Kabul or on large Forward Operating Bases with all the amenities, including air conditioning, hot food, in-door plumbing and recreation facilities. They occasionally venture outside their protected bubbles, but only under heavy protective escort. Many peoples around the world would give anything to be subjected to such “hardships.” This author would volunteer for such duty tomorrow. The lack of danger faced by these diplomats is reflected in the fact that State Department diplomats have suffered virtually no casualties during these past ten years of war. The only thing “extraordinary” about their actions is that the U.S. Congress continues to fund such a colossal waste of money.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), in an October 26, 2011, audit report of the State Department’s “civilian uplift” found the civilians to be:
Poorly trained
Lacking important skills
Uncertain of their duties
With a fractured chain of command
Having a poor information flow to Kabul, and
With an overall inability to adapt as lessons-learned were not being analyzed.

It concluded that security concerns (i.e., protecting the little darlings) were hurting the mission. It found the State Department civilians to have limited mobility in the countryside and in some areas the diplomats simply would not venture out of their bases (which the Embassy calls “platforms). As a result Afghans who wanted to deal with the Americans in those areas had to travel to the American bases and meet the diplomats inside. The U.S. Embassy is seemingly oblivious to the fact that it projects fear of the Taliban and weakness, which only enhances the Taliban. Mullah Omar reportedly refers to these U.S. diplomats as “askaran-e-atar” or perfume soldiers.

The State Department’s efforts are such a failure that the former U.S. Ambassador to Kabul (2005-2007) the Honorable Ronald E. Neumann, has been on a speaking tour about the problems. In a February 18, 2011, interview with the Huffington Post’s Michael Hughes, Ambassador Neumann railed against the decline in the missions and capabilities of the State Department and USAID. He spoke about their debilitating level of dependence on outside contractors due to an “outsourcing craze.” He criticized the short rotations of personnel into war zones and the high turnover in critical war zone positions. To Tom Paulson, he lambasted the poor language skills of American diplomats, opining that “Diplomats without language skills are like soldiers without bullets.” See “America’s Foreign Policy is Crumbling Says Leading Diplomat” (February 16, 2011). Needless to say Ambassador Neumann is not a favorite of either Secretary Clinton or Senator John Kerry and apparently is never asked to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which prefers Administration-friendly experts who rarely offer anything other than praise for State Department efforts.

Secretary Clinton’s solution to all the State Department’s ill is that it needs more money for more staff, more Special Ambassadors, more Assistant Secretaries, more programs, more reports and more consultants. It just needs more of everything. More is not necessary better as an overweight person does not need more fatty food. The State Department is bloated to such an extent that its effectiveness seems to decline at the same rate as its funding increases.

Secretary Clinton, in her June 2011, opening testimony to Congress made virtually no mention of the U.S. military’s efforts in Afghanistan, minor as they apparently are to her. Instead she went on to swear that her diplomatic surge in Afghanistan since 2009, had resulted in economic growth, a reduction in opium production and had caused 7.1 million Afghan children to enroll in school. She also took credit for an alleged 22% decline in infant mortality and the training and funding of “hundreds of thousands of farmers” (all highly suspect claims). If given a few more years Mrs. Clinton’s super-diplomats will likely end global warming, cure AIDS, revive extinct species and defeat al-Qaeda. None of Mrs. Clinton outrageous and erroneously statements were challenged by any of the seemingly comatose Senators on the Foreign Relations Committee. The Senators insists that all witnesses give sworn testimony; the reasons for this are unknown as the Senators seem to care little regarding the accuracy of testimony provided.

The bottom line is that the U.S. military is beginning to leave Afghanistan while U.S. diplomats are surging in. This dubious State Department effort is absorbing hundreds of millions of dollars in Afghan aid funds which should instead be going to the Afghan people. On the positive side the Afghan people should not be worried. As long as American diplomats continue to be supplied with champagne, hor dourves, fresh seafood and warm towels, they will bravely remain to battle the Taliban (from inside their Embassy fortress in Kabul). These State Department efforts are certain to drive the Taliban to the surrender table.

- by Matthew Nasuti

Steeds of War: !!!Torture at Bangladeshi Guantanamo Bay!!!

Steeds of War: !!!Torture at Bangladeshi Guantanamo Bay!!!: "This inscription is an anguish of broken hearted, repressed and despaired Mu’mins, some of whom have no more strength left in them to take ..."

Did six million jews really die?

did six million really die?

Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war the New York Times, February 22, 1948, placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,000,000 and a maximum of 18,000,000. Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. Fifteen and a half million in1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world's Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous.

The Real Reason for NATO Attacking Libya EXPOSED

Rings a bell !

Five Hundred Years Of Injustice:

Five Hundred Years of Injustice: The Legacy of Fifteenth Century Religious Prejudice

When Christopher Columbus first set foot on the white sands of Guanahani island, he performed a ceremony to "take possession" of the land for the king and queen of Spain, acting under the international laws of Western Christendom. Although the story of Columbus' "discovery" has taken on mythological proportions in most of the Western world, few people are aware that his act of "possession" was based on a religious doctrine now known in history as the Doctrine of Discovery. Even fewer people realize that today - five centuries later - the United States government still uses this archaic Judeo-Christian doctrine to deny the rights of Native American Indians.